The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights when respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided via the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking during the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed for the court in which the case is or will be filed.
long period petitioner wasn't regarded for promotion, meeting of your departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Let’s focus on what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
The issue here is that an accused may perhaps say that they intended to injure the target, but they did not intend to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted a result of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor supposed.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe for a foster child. Although the few had two youthful children of their have at home, the social worker didn't explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report for the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced younger children.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we're of the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion may very well be deemed, however, we're obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval from the competent authority.
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same kind of case.
Section 489-F from the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and coins. Its primary objective will be to suppress counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity on the national currency.
Stacy, a tenant within a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not here specified her more than enough notice before raising her rent, citing a completely new state legislation that requires a minimum of ninety times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.